Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Johne Cook's avatar

To your point, I've been using AI for writing for long enough that certain things stand out. While we're spotting tells, here are a few hiding in this copy:

* The subtitle written in Title Case

* "Not because it was wrong. Because it wasn't his." - a classic negative-contrast fragment pair

* "The giveaway?" - the one-word setup question

(And the em-dash—which happens to be my favorite punctuation mark, so I'm the last one who should be throwing stones, heh.)

The funny part is I agree with all of it. On Substack I draft with AI for speed and humanize from there. I just passed 1,000 consecutive days writing on LinkedIn and use the same process over there.

I've always been a good writer and a better rewriter, so this process works for me.

Heather Carey, MS's avatar

This right here sounds like AI…

“The goal isn’t to write less with AI.

It’s to make sure the last person who touched it was you.”

That’s the dead giveaway - start with a negative, next sentence positive

You can spot it a mile away, and everyone is doing it.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?